1
1Mind1Spirit
Guest
Mattathias said:If the Gospels and Acts were written pre 70 AD, then it would simply mean that the destruction of the Temple hadn’t happened yet and suggests that they weren’t aware of any connection between that event and Jesus’ prophecy. If they were written after then either they weren’t aware of a connection or they were aware and missed a golden opportunity to say that what Jesus prophesied had happened.
What will the world look like after Jesus returns? If he returned in 70 AD then it looks like it has from 70 AD to the present and, presumably, will always look like going forward. I don’t think that fits well with what the OT prophets envisioned.
And if preterism dates to c. 1600 AD, then how does that nix casting doubt on preterism?
"If Luke was written as early as 60 AD then it’s easy to see why he doesn’t identify / connect the prophecy given by Jesus as the Roman destruction of the Temple - it hadn’t happened yet. If he wrote after 70 AD then we are left with the same question we have about Matthew - why doesn’t he mention it?"