A
Arial
Guest
If all you are going to do is make statements as though the word is you---"Shroom said, and so it is." I don't consider that a debate or a discussion. It is just you spouting off. There is nothing to learn or even ponder there.The MK will be on this renovated earth, the new heaven and earth comes after the MK.
There's a difference between the church Jesus was, and is, building and the Christian church.
He didn't. Nobody did except God.
Christianity was the secret.
If it was prophesied, the devil would have known about it, and the Bible says if the devil had known about it he would not have crucified Christ.
Yes he did. Christianity is not in the OT.
The kingdom isn't here at all. If it was, this world would be a much better place. The kingdom will be paradise on earth
You followed covenant theology, and amillennialism.
If I understood you correctly, you claimed the new birth is the first resurrection.
Rev 20:
4 And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.
5 But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection.
I hope you would agree that Rev 20:4 is not talking about the new birth... Then verse 5: "This [verse 4] is the first resurrection."
You hold to covenant theology. I hold to dispensationalism.
John 3 is talking about resurrection.
Your religion sees it as God spiritually birthing people to believe the gospel in order to hang on to Calvinism with all their might.