When did the word of God become flesh - a part of his Son?

[APAK]

Correct.
I believe the language of scripture bears it out that YHWH is multi-personal.




Whoa!
I believe the authors are deceptive in their belief that YHWH is not multi-personal.
What I don't find deceptive is their research on the historical fact that Jews believed YHWH is multi-personal for centuries.

As you say and believe. And then what are you going to do with their non-deception, based on their research and findings that are not unique to these authors either? Use it as some sort of support of your already engrained belief that the logos = Jesus for example? Just curious as I thought it had to be important to you as you brought this subject up in the first place.

Yeeeeehaaaa!

Oh dear, you just got a few busted spokes off one of your rear wagon wheels Sissy. Turned that corner too sharply and hit that huge boulder.

Need it fixed? Happy to oblige...

 

[7thMoon]

Of course it is.
It is literature written by ancient Jews that studied scripture.

It is fake history. Especially Macabbees and Esther.

 

[Sissy]

It is fake history.

No it's not.
There is no doubt that Jews believed YHWH was multi-personal based on scripture for centuries.

 

[Sissy]

Need it fixed?

Not broken, so no.

 

[7thMoon]

No it's not.
There is no doubt that Jews believed YHWH was multi-personal based on scripture for centuries.

It isn't Israelite literature, but it is post 2nd temple. And Philo Judeaus works are actually post-Valentinus and during Justin Martyr's life.

 

[Sissy]

It isn't Israelite literature,

The literature I'm talking about is.

but it is post 2nd temple.

There is literature from the 2nd temple period.

And Philo Judeaus works are actually post-Valentinus and during Justin Martyr's life.

And????

You can deny it all you want, but the historical fact is that Jews believed God is multi--personal for centuries.

 

[7thMoon]

The literature I'm talking about is.

Philo and the Talmud are not.

There is literature from the 2nd temple period.

It is called the Tenak.

And????

You can deny it all you want, but the historical fact is that Jews believed God is multi--personal for centuries.

Whatever, it is you who is the idolater in denial.

 

[Sissy]

Philo and the Talmud are not.

Oh, so you want to battle a stawman!
I haven't mentioned either of them.

It is called the Tenak.

It's called 2nd temple literature found in a variety of places including the Dead Sea Scrolls.

Whatever, it is you who is the idolater in denial.

I'm not the one denying historical facts.

 

[7thMoon]

Oh, so you want to battle a stawman!
I haven't mentioned either of them.


It's called 2nd temple literature found in a variety of places including the Dead Sea Scrolls.

I thought the DSS were done in the Bar Kochba era.

I'm not the one denying historical facts.

As an idolater, you don't understand the historical facts of Judaism.

 

[Sissy]

As an idolater, you don't understand the historical facts of Judaism.

The historical facts are well documented.

 

[7thMoon]

The historical facts are well documented.

Yes, they are against making the God into a man.

 

[Sissy]

Yes, they are against making the God into a man.

They are for making YHWH multi-personal according to scripture.