N
NetChaplain
Guest
You can't desire evil and holiness! If God did not "work" this in us we would go our own way!Phil 2:13 does not say that God keeps a Christian from ever wanting to do evil.
You can't desire evil and holiness! If God did not "work" this in us we would go our own way!Phil 2:13 does not say that God keeps a Christian from ever wanting to do evil.
Many Christians do go their own way. Paul "went his own way" when he was determined to go to Jerusalem even after being repeatedly warned by God not to go (Acts 20:22ff). It nearly cost him his life.You can't desire evil and holiness! If God did not "work" this in us we would go our own way!
Yes, He gives us a heart after Him! We are to endure the sin nature to learn of His holiness; which of course is well worth enduring His plan of salvation. Our sin nature is used to bring us as close as possible to God, which is enduring what we must through the sin nature--so we could be--not just with Him (as Adam and Eve), but in Him!Many Christians do go their own way. Paul "went his own way" when he was determined to go to Jerusalem even after being repeatedly warned by God not to go (Acts 20:22ff). It nearly cost him his life.
God absolutely does work in Christians to will and to do His good pleasure, and we should be listening, and make every effort to do what God wants us to do. But He does not possess people, He does not force them to do what He wants. If He did, we would never sin again.
Your question(s) superimposes your thinking upon the character of God who needs to be revered, not used in this sort of question. The question also superimposes upon me that you believe that unless I am agreeing with your position, then I am almost guilty of such perverted thoughts or assessment of the character of God. I was going to quote both of your posts, but I would feel guilty if I repeated what you asked. Subject closed.Ok, in other words you are not going to answer. That’s ok, it is a tough question.
When using the word superimposes do you mean another way of understanding . Like that of parables another level of understanding?Greetings again Grace Accepted,
Your question(s) superimposes your thinking upon the character of God who needs to be revered, not used in this sort of question. The question also superimposes upon me that you believe that unless I am agreeing with your position, then I am almost guilty of such perverted thoughts or assessment of the character of God. I was going to quote both of your posts, but I would feel guilty if I repeated what you asked. Subject closed.
Kind regards
Trevor
You need say no more, you are just not going to answer and I understand why. Giving a moral scolding on your superior understanding of God is not necessary.Greetings again Grace Accepted,
Your question(s) superimposes your thinking upon the character of God who needs to be revered, not used in this sort of question. The question also superimposes upon me that you believe that unless I am agreeing with your position, then I am almost guilty of such perverted thoughts or assessment of the character of God. I was going to quote both of your posts, but I would feel guilty if I repeated what you asked. Subject closed.
Kind regards
Trevor
I need to apologise for my statements, partly I could have misunderstood what you were asking. Either an indirect answer or a breaking down of whether OSAS is correct and also the word you used "love", is seen in the following:You need say no more, you are just not going to answer and I understand why. Giving a moral scolding on your superior understanding of God is not necessary.
Paul had vowed a vow.Many Christians do go their own way. Paul "went his own way" when he was determined to go to Jerusalem even after being repeatedly warned by God not to go (Acts 20:22ff). It nearly cost him his life.
Acts 20:23 Save that the Holy Ghost witnesseth in every city, saying that bonds and afflictions abide me.Paul had vowed a vow.
The Holy Spirit would not be warning him to break it.
King James Bible
When thou shalt vow a vow unto the LORD thy God, thou shalt not slack to pay it: for the LORD thy God will surely require it of thee; and it would be sin in thee.
And then God kills them for eternity?Greetings again Grace Accepted,
I need to apologise for my statements, partly I could have misunderstood what you were asking. Either an indirect answer or a breaking down of whether OSAS is correct and also the word you used "love", is seen in the following:
Matthew 24:12: Under severe trial many will fall away.
1 Corinthians 9:26-27: The fight against sin is ongoing, with the possibility of rejection if we fail, if our love for the things of God becomes dull and ineffectual.
1 Timothy 4:1: Some will fall away from the truth.
2 Timothy 4:1: There is a judgement seat in the future when Christ returns, and salvation is not automatic.
1 Corinthians 4:4-5: we need to await the outcome of the judgement.
Matthew 7:21: Many will be rejected.
2 Timothy 4:6-7: Paul had been faithful, and note this is also an inspired comment.
2 Timothy 4:8: Paul recognises Jesus as a righteous judge, and that as a result he will be given the reward of everlasting life. Those also that love the return of Jesus, the appearing when he comes to establish the kingdom and reward the faithful will also receive everlasting life.
2 Timothy 4:10: For one reason or another, possibly the stress of the situation caused Demas to fail, his love waxed cold and he turned again to the world, even loved this world.
Kind regards
Trevor
The rejected at the judgement seat will experience some suffering and later the second death. The majority of people are not subject to the judgement, but simply live their lives and die and return to the dust Genesis 3:19.And then God kills them for eternity?
Meyer's NT CommentaryGod did not want Paul to go to Jerusalem. He went anyway.