M
Mr G Lee
Guest
God did not tangle.
Trins tangled.
Yes, should of been he allowed it to get tangled ,He untangled it at the time first century reformation
God did not tangle.
Trins tangled.
What are you saying?Yes, should of been he allowed it to get tangled ,He untangled it at the time first century reformation
Well, no.The witness of two as unity was tangled as three until the time of the first century reformation (Hebrew 9)
God tangled it when the athiest Jews gathered themselves together and demanded a king and queen form of government. Earthly inspired after the oral traditions of men,
The Jews had become jealous of the surrounding pagan nations and their religions foundation of "out of sight out of mind" Not trusting the unseen king of kings rejecting God from reigning over them by faith. natural unconverted mankind . .
1 Samuel 8 :6 But the thing displeased Samuel, when they said, Give us a king to judge us. And Samuel prayed unto the Lord. And the Lord said unto Samuel, Hearken unto the voice of the people in all that they say unto thee: for they have not rejected thee, but they have rejected me, that I should not reign over them.According to all the works which they have done since the day that I brought them up out of Egypt even unto this day, wherewith they have forsaken me, and served other gods, so do they also unto thee. Now therefore hearken unto their voice: howbeit yet protest solemnly unto them, and shew them the manner of the king that shall reign over them.
The third member (trinity) was introduced (queen of heaven ) when the unbelieving Jewish woman gathered around to liberate them with full permission from the men they demanded having their own he and she gods. God gave them over to do that which they should not of until the time of the first century reformation.
A doctrine that seems to be avoided for some reason ??
Jeremiah 44: 15 Then all the men which knew that their wives had burned incense unto other gods, and all the women that stood by, a great multitude, even all the people that dwelt in the land of Egypt, in Pathros, answered Jeremiah, saying, As for the word that thou hast spoken unto us in the name of the Lord, we will not hearken unto thee. But we will certainly do whatsoever thing goeth forth out of our own mouth, to burn incense unto the queen of heaven, and to pour out drink offerings unto her, as we have done, we, and our fathers, our kings, and our princes, in the cities of Judah, and in the streets of Jerusalem: for then had we plenty of victuals, and were well, and saw no evil. But since we left off to burn incense to the queen of heaven, and to pour out drink offerings unto her, we have wanted all things, and have been consumed by the sword and by the famine. And when we burned incense to the queen of heaven, and poured out drink offerings unto her, did we make her cakes to worship her, and pour out drink offerings unto her, without our men?
Again the 1st century reformation untangled those three. . .the added queen of heaven. just as the 15th century reformation same queen. The third of what some call trinity different name .One that Christ calls the strange woman. . not his bride.
Two (father not seen son seen ) makes up a company. Three is a crowd .
Three is used to denote the end of a manner in parables .
Please provide a reference or two for this.Ancient Jews used their own scriptures to arrive at the conclusion that YHWH is a unity of persons.
I have listed several of the scriptures they use many times.Please provide a reference or two for this.
Maybe so.Guys, this is not new information.
It's been known and documented for years by several academic scholars of both trin believers and non-trin believers.
Well, no.
Ancient Jews used their own scriptures to arrive at the conclusion that YHWH is a unity of persons.
Had nothing to do with being jealous of pagan nations.
And the queen of heaven was most certainly not one they considered to be of the unity of YHWH.
That men of the nation of Israel believed YHWH to be a unity of persons doesn't have squat to do with scripture not belonging to men of any nation.Hi thanks for the reply.. I would offer.
Scripture as it is writen by the finger of God does not belong to and man of any nation .
They got it.Maybe so.
But the Jews that were in charge when Jesus was here didn't get the memo.
Godliness.They got it.
That's why Thomas the disciple could call the Son his Lord and his God.
That's why the writers of the NT could use terminology that was believed on by generations of Jews even before Christ was born.
Terminology such as LOGOS/MEMRA/WORD and COMING ON THE CLOUDS and SON OF MAN, etc.
Those were terms that the ancient Jews knew were another distinct person of YHWH.
No self respecting Jew believed that.That men of the nation of Israel believed YHWH to be a unity of persons doesn't have squat to do with scripture not belonging to men of any nation.
^^^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judaism's_view_of_Jesus
Thomas wasn't in charge.That's why Thomas the disciple could call the Son his Lord and his God.