T
The_drake_
Guest
He will become like one of us elohim means he is including himself in that category. He was speaking in the same manner earlier.
I understand why this is inconvenient, but it is what the meaning of the text is.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
I understand why this is inconvenient, but it is what the meaning of the text is.
7
7thMoon
Guest
Languages just don't happen. Bilinguals have made new ones for 2000 years.You have no evidence for that, just like the rest of it. More totally far out claims. Why don't you start by defending the least of these, instead of continuing to re raise with more and more extravagant ones.
T
The_drake_
Guest
Correct. The answer is unknown. We do not default to an absurd claim like all languages evolved out of Aramaic just because we don't know.You have no evidence that the others happened at Babel or that they evolved into existence.
Chinese is definitely not a form of Aramaic. Nor is finish. Nor is that tongue clucking language in Africa.
7
7thMoon
Guest
"Us" was not elohim, but the divine tribunal.He will become like one of us elohim means he is including himself in that category. He was speaking in the same manner earlier.
I understand why this is inconvenient, but it is what the meaning of the text is.
T
The_drake_
Guest
And you know this how?Languages just don't happen. Bilinguals have made new ones for 2000 years.
7
7thMoon
Guest
I didn't say they evolved out of Aramaic, though Greek burrowed all of its idioms from it. An artificial language is not an evolved or natural language.Correct. The answer is unknown. We do not default to an absurd claim like all languages evolved out of Aramaic just because we don't know.
Chinese is definitely not a form of Aramaic. Nor is finish. Nor is that tongue clucking language in Africa.
T
The_drake_
Guest
Except he doesn't say that, he says elohim."Us" was not elohim, but the divine tribunal.
7
7thMoon
Guest
English and French are examples. There has been much tampering in both.And you know this how?
7
7thMoon
Guest
What?Except he doesn't say that, he says elohim.
7
7thMoon
Guest
You are a biased shirker. That is the only thing inconvenient.He will become like one of us elohim means he is including himself in that category. He was speaking in the same manner earlier.
I understand why this is inconvenient, but it is what the meaning of the text is.
T
The_drake_
Guest
I don't understand what your position is anymore. As long as you aren't claiming Greek or that all languages are some changed form of Aramaic, we have no issues.English and French are examples. There has been much tampering in both.
If you want to believe that Hebrew was invented by God then that's fine. I don't think it matters.
7
7thMoon
Guest
Greek is modeled after the Aramaic dialect though. It was intentionally different phonetically. I believe the Greeks and Romans learned it from the Babylonians.I don't understand what your position is anymore. As long as you aren't claiming Greek or that all languages are some changed form of Aramaic, we have no issues.
If you want to believe that Hebrew was invented by God then that's fine. I don't think it matters.