• Welcome to White Horse Forums. We ask that you would please take a moment to introduce yourself in the New Members section. Tell us a bit about yourself and dive in!

Chemtrails & Weather Modification

Jasher said:
That is the only way the sun man and stars could run a circuit above a stationary earth is by one's imagination.​

If one actually examines data from the practical application of a flat earth, they will find that it either repeats the data from the globe earth or when the​
data differs between the two, the flat earth data always shows to be in error.


The current cosmology is based upon the concept of the eternal universe which arose after the philosophical dictum of nothing comes from nothing. ​

When Aquinas attempted to prove the existence of God with the first cause argument, in which he argued that the universe exists therefore it must have a​
cause for its existence, thus he concluded that since the universe exists, it therefore must have a cause. And that cause he concluded was God. The problem with that argument is that the effect cannot be it own cause since the premise is that everything that exists must have a cause for its existence. So therefore if a God exists, then God must have a cause for his existence.
While Aquinas tried to use God being eternal therefore needing no cause for existence, the same argument was used for the universe citing that it was​
eternal therefore needed no cause for its existence. nor a creator.
If you listen to the big bang theory carefully, it holds that all matter, space and energy already existed prior to the rapid expanse from a condensed​
state to form our current known and observed universe. In fact, the big bang theory is the Catholic interpretation of Genesis 1:1 which is the reason they declared it compatible with the scriptures. However, it examined carefully it contradicts the principle of 'create' which is bringing something into existence which has never existed prior to its being brought into existence and could not have occurred in nature except but for the divine act which brought it into existence. If space, matter, energy already existed in a highly condensed state then it wasn't created, it evolved from one form to another.
One could say that the big bang theory is the new age trinity doctrine. Flat earther are just playing the role of the idiot to persuade those in the middle to follow their big bang theory putting the flat earth as the only other option.

So yes, todays cosmology is at best pseudoscience, being unprincipled. ​

Well, if you can state what the width of the flat earth is, without citing the diameter of a sphere, then you might have a point. ​
Click to expand...
Actually, the globe model fits just as well as if the earth was stationary and flat. Flat earth doesn't copy the Masonic globe farce, it is what it is; simple. The globe needs a tilted axis at 66.6 degrees and requires the earth to spin at over 1000 mph and to also be flying through space at 66,666 mph.
 
Jasher said:
That is the only way the sun man and stars could run a circuit above a stationary earth is by one's imagination.
If one actually examines data from the practical application of a flat earth, they will find that it either repeats the data from the globe earth or when the data differs between the two, the flat earth data always shows to be in error.
Click to expand...
Wrong.
Navigation is done by establishing elevation angles from a horizontal plane.
 
Jasher said:
​
Well, if you can state what the width of the flat earth is, without citing the diameter of a sphere, then you might have a point. ​
Click to expand...
No answer? Let me rephrase the question, what is the distance between the point on the Left to the point on the Right?

1663582416106.png
 
patrick jane said:
Job 38:18 KJV - Hast thou perceived the breadth of the earth? declare if thou knowest it all.
Click to expand...
That is the reason I asked you if you could state the width of the flat earth.

I take it that 'declare it if thou knowest it all" is somewhat intimidating huh? But ye have an unction from the Holy One, and ye know all things. [1 John 2:20] right?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
1Mind1Spirit said:
The diameter of the habitable part of earth.
Click to expand...
The distance between those two points should be approximately the same as the circumference of the global earth, so are you suggesting that the circumference of the flat earth is 78,000 miles since the distance from the South Pole to the North Pole and back to the South Pole isn't the diameter of the global earth.
 
Jasher said:
The distance between those two points should be approximately the same as the circumference of the global earth, so are you suggesting that the circumference of the flat earth is 78,000 miles since the distance from the South Pole to the North Pole and back to the South Pole isn't the diameter of the global earth.
Click to expand...
First off the diameter is not the same as circumference.
Secondly the diameter in the pic is of a circle.
The circle of the earth the Lord looks down on not a ball.
Nothing to do with a globe.
 
1Mind1Spirit said:
First off the diameter is not the same as circumference.
Click to expand...

LOL, the red line is across the diameter of the flat earth shown in the diagram.

1663714241390.png
So if you going to claim that distance between those two points, which represents the diameter of the flat earth, is approximately 24,900 miles then the circumference of that flat earth must be approximately 78,000 as represented by the orange line in the illustration below,

1663714772947.png
Apparently you don't know all things or else you wouldn't have responded to the question asking if a flat earther could answer the question regarding the distance between the two points mark on the flat earth with the response "the diameter of the habitable earth"; especially when the request asked that the response didn't cite the diameter of the spherical earth claimed by scientists.

1Mind1Spirit said:
The circle of the earth the Lord looks down on not a ball.
Click to expand...

So let me ask, what do shape do you see when you look down upon a round ball?

I noticed you prefixed your statement with "the LORD looks down" which is odd since being omnipresent the LORD would see the earth from every which direction, and no matter from what direction you looked upon a ball you would see a circle. But the only way someone could see a flat earth as a circle would be looking was from looking above or below.

Which brings up the question regarding who he who sits upon the circle of the earth. But let's look at the previous verse, being Isaiah 40, verse 21 which begins "Have ye not known? have ye not heard? hath it not been told you from the beginning? have ye not understood from the foundations of the earth?

If you believe that Satan was cast out of heaven then the 'he" who "sitteth upon that flat earth" is obviously not the LORD since it is written in Isaiah 66:1 that heaven is the throne of the LORD and the earth is his footstool.
​
 
Jasher said:
Well, if you can state what the width of the flat earth is, without citing the diameter of a sphere, then you might have a point.
Click to expand...
This what I did, thus making my point.
You should really try to keep up with your own statements.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top