• Welcome to White Horse Forums. We ask that you would please take a moment to introduce yourself in the New Members section. Tell us a bit about yourself and dive in!

Chemtrails & Weather Modification

P

patrick jane

Guest
Weather hasn't been natural since the mid 1900's or maybe even earlier and NASA has it's name written all over it. Of course, HAARP and HAARP-like facilities as well as chemtrails play their role. Weather modification programs have been active for decades and still people choose to ignore them and act they are only "conspiracy theories". There are new ones like NEXRAD and SBX-1.



GPS Coordinates for 20 of the Top HAARP facilities
goldenageofgaia.com

Accountability

Sometimes, during a site renovation or update, an URL can change without being noticed. Where you find a non-functioning URL, simply copy the name of the article and enter it i…
goldenageofgaia.com goldenageofgaia.com


History of Weather Modification:
weathermodificationhistory.com

ClimateViewer News • Tracking the Climate Changers

Are You a ClimateViewer? Knowing is half the battle.
weathermodificationhistory.com weathermodificationhistory.com



Secret Chemtrail Pilot Speaks, on Dec 8, 2014​



11 minutes



From the video:
This video contains text, which was forwarded to me. The source is highly credible, and this message originally came from a USAF pilot, who flies Aerosol Tankers, as part of the secret Indigo Skyfold (geoengineered aerosol "chemtrail") program.
Please save this text, and forward the video!

I've known the source for over a year, and I have POST confirmation of most of the things he's told me, IN ADVANCE.
Also, IF THIS WAS DISINFO, the last message from the pilot would be "after Jan 20, 2015, they are shutting down the program".
INSTEAD, he says the opposite: "a very new "extremely toxic" chemtrail mix, is going to be sprayed. Using new technology, that makes these special chemtrails, completely invisible."
That is not how disinfo works. The last communication was the opportunity to calm the herd, instead, it is a call to action.
If you have a geiger counter, with an alpha/beta probe, please test the aerosol fallout. The best way to test the aerosols, is to wipe your car hood, and windshield, with a clean paper towel, after a dry period of heavy spraying. Then, test the towel for alpha and beta radiation. This is especially important in California, which has no natural radon sources upwind.

BTW, the building at 7:30 is the International Criminal Court, at The Hague, Netherlands. This is where the criminals behind these programs need to be taken, to be put on trial, while the world watches.

P.S. if anyone can do a better job of narration, please upload your own video! Don't let this disappear from the internet!
The first comment has the complete pilot text, so please copy it, and spread the word.
Thanks!

P.P.S. This is my only video, where a shady group of investors offered to purchase the rights to the video. I didn't sell, of course. No money should change hands, while the public is being offered this information.
 

What you need to know about H.A.A.R.P. and the incoming STORM​



Is H.A.A.R.P. still being used by the U.S. military? What is the true function of this technology? Does it have any connection to current weather events?


15 minutes
 
What follows is a link to a 65+ megabyte pdf file from the US government on geoengineering. This document was created by Congress in 1978 and there is so little for Congress to study at that time the document is only 748 pages long.


www.geoengineeringwatch.org/documents/Weather%20Modification%20-%20Programs,%20Problems,%20Policy,%20And%20Potential%20(May%201978,%20784%20pages).pdf



Here is a report from the House of Representatives on how to go about negotiating international cooperation for something that doesn't exist. The following link downloads a pdf file which contains the report.

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/documents/ushousereport.pdf



Now here is a paper from the Congressional Research Service titled: Geoenginering: Governance and Technology Policy. Odd how the government is producing policies for things that do not exist. Pretty strange, isn't it? They are producing policies for somthing that is only a conspiracy theory.

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/documents/Geoengineering.pdf



Here's a few links that show this. I've included links to Oxford, Scientific American, and Britannica.

http://www.geoengineering.ox.ac.uk/what-is-geoengineering/what-is-geoengineering/

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/geoengineering-and-climate-change/

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/...limate-chaos-and-environmental-catastrophe-2/

https://www.britannica.com/science/geoengineering




I thought I'd post a few more links to government documents concerning geoengineering.

This one comes from Britain. It downloads a document from The Royal Society.
http://royalsociety.org/uploadedFiles/Royal_Society_Content/policy/publications/2009/8693.pdf



Here's another document from The Royal Society. It's discussion on "taking control of our planet's climate". Can't see how anything could go wrong there. We understand less than half of how it works so we couldn't make dangerous mistakes which have far worse side effects than what we experience now.

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/documents/discussion meeting -#CBB0C8.pdf



Here is a document from the European Parliment back in 1998 on the HAARP project and it's danger to us.
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/press/sdp/backg/en/1998/b980209.htm



Here is a document created by the DoD on how the US military can own the weather and use it as a weapon of war by 2025.

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/documents/vol3ch15.pdf



Back to geoengineering.

The following link has a long list of patents and trademarks for the technology used in geoengineering.

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/links-to-geoengineering-patents/
 

Contrails and Chemtrails are not the same thing!​



I captured this chemtrail expanding on my way home. If this is a contrail then why is it in the sky all day? Why does it cover the entire sky like a blanket? Sorry, I'm not buying it.



1 minute
 
Yes, there is a difference between a contrail and a chemtrail.

The contrail is the condensation that occurs from that the hot engine exhaust in the cooler temperatures of the upper atmosphere.

Chemtrails are particulates that are released in the atmosphere that allow for their detection by satellite imagery so that the wind currents can be observed. The particulates get disbursed in the atmosphere allow them to observed thru different filters depending on the type of particulates being used.

So in simple words, they are part of research projects to better understand how the circuits operate.

.
 
Jasher said:
Yes, there is a difference between a contrail and a chemtrail.

The contrail is the condensation that occurs from that the hot engine exhaust in the cooler temperatures of the upper atmosphere.

Chemtrails are particulates that are released in the atmosphere that allow for their detection by satellite imagery so that the wind currents can be observed. The particulates get disbursed in the atmosphere allow them to observed thru different filters depending on the type of particulates being used.

So in simple words, they are part of research projects to better understand how the circuits operate.

.
Click to expand...
Interesting take. Imagine this, the sun, moon and stars run a circuit above the stationary earth. Cosmology in the modern era is a guessing game and it's pseudoscience. You have been brainwashed just as billions of others and you picture the earth as a ball, just flying through space endlessly.
 
patrick jane said:
Imagine this, the sun, moon and stars run a circuit above the stationary earth.
Click to expand...
That is the only way the sun man and stars could run a circuit above a stationary earth is by one's imagination.​

If one actually examines data from the practical application of a flat earth, they will find that it either repeats the data from the globe earth or when the​
data differs between the two, the flat earth data always shows to be in error.

patrick jane said:
Cosmology in the modern era is a guessing game and it's pseudoscience.
Click to expand...
The current cosmology is based upon the concept of the eternal universe which arose after the philosophical dictum of nothing comes from nothing. ​

When Aquinas attempted to prove the existence of God with the first cause argument, in which he argued that the universe exists therefore it must have a​
cause for its existence, thus he concluded that since the universe exists, it therefore must have a cause. And that cause he concluded was God. The problem with that argument is that the effect cannot be it own cause since the premise is that everything that exists must have a cause for its existence. So therefore if a God exists, then God must have a cause for his existence.
While Aquinas tried to use God being eternal therefore needing no cause for existence, the same argument was used for the universe citing that it was​
eternal therefore needed no cause for its existence. nor a creator.
If you listen to the big bang theory carefully, it holds that all matter, space and energy already existed prior to the rapid expanse from a condensed​
state to form our current known and observed universe. In fact, the big bang theory is the Catholic interpretation of Genesis 1:1 which is the reason they declared it compatible with the scriptures. However, it examined carefully it contradicts the principle of 'create' which is bringing something into existence which has never existed prior to its being brought into existence and could not have occurred in nature except but for the divine act which brought it into existence. If space, matter, energy already existed in a highly condensed state then it wasn't created, it evolved from one form to another.
One could say that the big bang theory is the new age trinity doctrine. Flat earther are just playing the role of the idiot to persuade those in the middle to follow their big bang theory putting the flat earth as the only other option.

So yes, todays cosmology is at best pseudoscience, being unprincipled. ​
patrick jane said:
You have been brainwashed just as billions of others and you picture the earth as a ball, just flying through space endlessly.
Click to expand...
Well, if you can state what the width of the flat earth is, without citing the diameter of a sphere, then you might have a point. ​
 
Jasher said:
That is the only way the sun man and stars could run a circuit above a stationary earth is by one's imagination.​

If one actually examines data from the practical application of a flat earth, they will find that it either repeats the data from the globe earth or when the​
data differs between the two, the flat earth data always shows to be in error.


The current cosmology is based upon the concept of the eternal universe which arose after the philosophical dictum of nothing comes from nothing. ​

When Aquinas attempted to prove the existence of God with the first cause argument, in which he argued that the universe exists therefore it must have a​
cause for its existence, thus he concluded that since the universe exists, it therefore must have a cause. And that cause he concluded was God. The problem with that argument is that the effect cannot be it own cause since the premise is that everything that exists must have a cause for its existence. So therefore if a God exists, then God must have a cause for his existence.
While Aquinas tried to use God being eternal therefore needing no cause for existence, the same argument was used for the universe citing that it was​
eternal therefore needed no cause for its existence. nor a creator.
If you listen to the big bang theory carefully, it holds that all matter, space and energy already existed prior to the rapid expanse from a condensed​
state to form our current known and observed universe. In fact, the big bang theory is the Catholic interpretation of Genesis 1:1 which is the reason they declared it compatible with the scriptures. However, it examined carefully it contradicts the principle of 'create' which is bringing something into existence which has never existed prior to its being brought into existence and could not have occurred in nature except but for the divine act which brought it into existence. If space, matter, energy already existed in a highly condensed state then it wasn't created, it evolved from one form to another.
One could say that the big bang theory is the new age trinity doctrine. Flat earther are just playing the role of the idiot to persuade those in the middle to follow their big bang theory putting the flat earth as the only other option.

So yes, todays cosmology is at best pseudoscience, being unprincipled. ​

Well, if you can state what the width of the flat earth is, without citing the diameter of a sphere, then you might have a point. ​
Click to expand...
Job 38:18 KJV - Hast thou perceived the breadth of the earth? declare if thou knowest it all.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top