Greetings again QuestionIt,
Read the article, and decide for yourself.
One paragraph from his article states:
"For two hundred years, scholars have believed based on Greek sources and conjecture that the Hebrew name of God was originally pronounced “Yahweh.” In late 2016, Gordon found never-translated traditional Jewish sources that explicitly identified the vowels of God’s name in Hebrew as “Yehovah.” This is similar to the English Jehovah, but with a “Y” and the emphasis on the final syllable."
I suggest he is making the same error as answered by Rotherham and the old JW article which is too embarrassing for the modern JWs. Glancing at his other articles he seems to support the rendition "I AM", and could himself be a Trinitarian - please check. Also his article does not answer my question to you:
How do you understand the relevance of YHWH with the vowel pointings of Elohim in the Bible?
I don't trust church scholars who say it should be replaced, and you need vowels to say it!
I cannot make much sense of your statement. I have not encountered anyone who wants to deliberately replace YHWH, and even the KJV gives all capitals LORD and GOD for the two different versions of YHWH. This distinguishes between the One God, Yahweh, God the Father represented by "LORD" in Psalm 110:1 from our Lord Jesus Christ who is represented by "Lord" in Psalm 110:1. Rotherham and the two Catholic Bibles JB and NJB use Yahweh throughout, as does Alec Motyer in his translations of the Psalms and Isaiah.
I do not consider whether or not we see a close representation of YHWH as being an issue, and I doubt whether it has anything to do with the subject of the Trinity. Actually I initially prefer a Bible that has "LORD" for the use of immature English readers and the public, as God's Name is holy and should be hallowed. Initially people should be introduced to God as God, the Father, and later they could learn the meaning of the Yahweh Name. If I was reading the KJV to immature believers or strangers I would most probably use "LORD", but when reading to our mainly mature meeting of believers, then I would deliberately substitute Yahweh for the KJV LORD. The overall JW position is incorrect, and maintains an error.
Kind regards
Trevor