Pops, last I heard this thread was about winds of doctrine---not me, not being chastised by a school marm for not wanting to engage in useless but extremely time consuming put down of all I say. There was no need to read it. I have read it all before, he simply keeps repeating himself using different words with "religious philosophy" threaded through them all. Something you were no doubt unaware of when you decided to shake your finger at me. And attacks are often presented as questions. In your "question" were direct and sweeping and false accusations against me. That is an attack.
If you think he makes some valid points, it is because you agree with him. Fine. Do so. That doesn't mean I have to or that I am prevented from saying that I disagree. And fyi, I did read and respond to the OP BEFORE I made that comment. What I got back began, and I am sure continued in not addressing anything I said except to say once again that anything that I believe, or anything that anyone says that disagrees with his religious philosophy, is wrong and nothing more that the lie that Eve believed. And since I scrolled and say that he was going to take eons of time and space to say what he has already said a hundred times, and I had asked him politely not to do this our of respect for the time of others, I simply posted what I did.
Here is a question for you. Why is it that you can not have pleasant exchanges with those you disagree with, or not get involved in their conversation with someone else, without eventually making it about the perceived faults of that person rather than the OP? Starting an argument about nothing to do with you in other words.
There will be no more responses to you from me in this vein.