O'Darby III
Active member
I didn't realize this was the "change" you were talking about. The point Professor Brown made is exactly the point I made in the "inspiration" thread I started yesterday -“It is impossible to document what we now call orthodoxy in the first two centuries of Christianity; heresy often appears more prominently, so much so that orthodoxy looks like a reaction to it. But we can document orthodoxy for all the centuries since then - in other words, for close to seventeen centuries of the church’s existence.”
(Harold O.J. Brown, Heresies: Heresy And Orthodoxy In The History Of The Church, p. 5)
Is "inspiration" just a semantic game?
I'm not talking about the process - not about how you think inspiration "worked" in the case of the OT authors or someone like Paul. I'm talking more about what the term even means, most specifically in the NT context. As I've become more deeply interested in early Christianity, it's just...
whitehorseforums.com